We'll believe LVCI is really retired when we stop seeing his IP# on our blog's SiteMeter(R) ten times a day. LVCI blames us for his retirement (?) and here we had been deemed "marginalized" and w/ "no credibility" (wink wink) and w/ nobody reading us. So apparently our strangle-hold (not a threat) influence is still very much intact, what a relief.
Formerly (oopsie) presumed smart person Jeff Pooley (pictured above) out of a sense of "civic duty" (wink wink), we suppose, vaulted himself off the Swiss sidelines to LVCI's aid yesterday w/ a subpoena-activating blog post entitled, "LVCI calls it quits."
Professor Pooley allowed no comments--not even moderated comments--at his post slamming us.
I emailed Professor Pooley last evening politely requesting that he phone me today. He emailed me back (in like 3 minutes) and said he would.
[UpDate: Pooley emailed us at 1:30-ish. His lengthy comment is reprinted in the comments section of this post in its lengthy 2-Part entirety. Pooley doesn't address my 3 Excellent Questions (nobody ever does) ... but he is commenting here and there's somewhat of a dialogue going on, see the comments ...]
FYI, I have 3 excellent questions for Jeff Pooley, PhD, if you happen to see him hiding under a desk at Muhlenberg College.
My 3 Excellent Questions for Professor Jeff Pooley
1. "LVCI cites the implied threats in the comments thread to LV Somebody’s most recent post, which are indeed troubling." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
Jeff, please point out these "troubling" "implied threats" to me, as they stood at the time you posted your blog on us.
2. " ... the main issue, says LVCI, is harassment and intimidation from the bloggers behind Lehigh Valley Somebody." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
Jeff, Bernie O'Hare and Dave Najarian have brayed similar accusations of "harassment and intimidation" against Angie and me and have taken us to court over these issues. Recently, criminal courts in both Lehigh and Northampton Counties found me not guilty and told the accusing parties, in essence, that they were full of shit. Since you've galloped in (on a white horse) to rescue and defend Team O'Hare member and anonymous coward "LVCI," I assume you have some firm beliefs regarding the legal merit of LVCI's accusations of "harassment and intimidation." Please explain them to me.
3. "I refuse to comment on the Villas’ dispute with others, just because I simply don’t know enough." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
And yet Jeff, curiously, you clearly perceive ...
a) The Villas as the "bad guys" who employ "tactics" you (somehow) know enough about to disapprove of ...
b) Team O'Hare are the "good guys" (know anything about their tactics?) who do not deserve to have their blogs "boycotted."
Please explain.
1. "LVCI cites the implied threats in the comments thread to LV Somebody’s most recent post, which are indeed troubling." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
Jeff, please point out these "troubling" "implied threats" to me, as they stood at the time you posted your blog on us.
2. " ... the main issue, says LVCI, is harassment and intimidation from the bloggers behind Lehigh Valley Somebody." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
Jeff, Bernie O'Hare and Dave Najarian have brayed similar accusations of "harassment and intimidation" against Angie and me and have taken us to court over these issues. Recently, criminal courts in both Lehigh and Northampton Counties found me not guilty and told the accusing parties, in essence, that they were full of shit. Since you've galloped in (on a white horse) to rescue and defend Team O'Hare member and anonymous coward "LVCI," I assume you have some firm beliefs regarding the legal merit of LVCI's accusations of "harassment and intimidation." Please explain them to me.
3. "I refuse to comment on the Villas’ dispute with others, just because I simply don’t know enough." -Jeff Pooley, Allentown Afterthoughts
And yet Jeff, curiously, you clearly perceive ...
a) The Villas as the "bad guys" who employ "tactics" you (somehow) know enough about to disapprove of ...
b) Team O'Hare are the "good guys" (know anything about their tactics?) who do not deserve to have their blogs "boycotted."
Please explain.
56 comments:
[Reprinted From Prior Post]
Anonymous said...
I have some qustions for "professer" Pooly too.
Have you ever had a daughter killed on her 25th birthday?
Have you ever had to fight a crony-crooked district attorney to get some measure of justice out of him?
Have you ever been rebuffed (239 times) by a newspaper that claimed to have a "Welcome Mat" out for anyone who wants to be heard? After that same newspaper's investigations editor told you you had "excellent questions that deserve to be answered?"
Have you ever had a blog put up about you that is dedicated to a) deceptively "spinning" all of your excellent questions, and b) defiling your deceased daughter?
Have you ever been asked if you've removed your dead daughter's name from your Christmas list?
Have you ever been asked if you keep your dead daughter's body in your basement so you can masturbate on it?
Have you ever been informed there are people stalking you, and urinating behind your house nightly?
Have you ever been falsely charged w/ "criminal harassment" when you attempted to defend yourself against allied evil sadists that include the vice president of city council?
Have you ever had two crony-crooked magistrates in two counties, two crony-crooked district attorneys in two counties, and the state attorney general collude to "fuck" w/ you ... just because they can?
Get back to me on these, perfessor, and I'll have more for you ...
Domain Name > muhlenberg.edu (Educational)
IP Address > 192.104.181.# (Muhlenberg College)
ISP > Muhlenberg College
City > Allentown
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 11:55:26 am
Domain Name > muhlenberg.edu (Educational)
IP Address > 192.104.181.# (Muhlenberg College)
ISP > Muhlenberg College
City > Allentown
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 12:24:05 pm
I have a "cash reward" of $5 that says Pooley pusses out and never calls you, any takers?
I bet a buck Pooley weasels out w/ the excuse, "I've been advised to not speak w/ you by my lawyer (for now)."
Hmm - still no call from the professor? Must be taking longer than he planned to get the recording apparatus set up to try to entrap you, Bill.
But we all know you'll keep your wits AND keep your cool if and when his phone call comes.
Plus he has to pre-think what he's gonna say, cuz he know you'll report his words here. He has to cover his ass with his cadre so no feathers are ruffled by whatever he may say to you.
Ugh. How tedious.
Still waiting for any of these jerks to man up and communicate up front and sensibly with you re: your excellent questions (excellent = rational, logical, clear, important, significant and most of all NOT NUTZ).
Won't hold my breath.
Soldier on!
Thanks, Jess. I'm thinking of recording whatever I say to Pooley cuz I'm sure it'll be priceless and I'll wanna have it verbatim for re-printing here. Nuthin' illegal about recording just my audio on a phone call, s'far as I know.
But Pooley won't call and here's what's gonna happen instead (I know how Team O'Hare operates) ...
* Ignoring completely the defamation and libel directed at Angie and me that was oozing from every pore of his blog slam of us yesterday, Pooley will instead self-centerdley focus on us having called him "pusillanimous" ... and this'll be his excuse for not manning up and confronting me as he said he would last night.
* He'll likely employ an O'Hare-Coached phrase such as, "I won't even dignify your "incoherent" (wink wink) rantings of a mad man w/ a response."
Betcha $20 :)
While we're all waiting ..........
how bout some music!
I'm cueing up Bill's New Theme Song ...
Somebody owes me $20 ... Part I
On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:26:08 PM, "Jefferson Pooley" wrote:
Dear Bill (and Angie),
I've decided not to call you, after reading your post and comments. I wanted a conversation, but you have already called me a "douchebag," a "loyal Team O'Hare Lap Dog," "another pussy whipped" and much more--before we even had a chance to talk. That's not a conversation. It is, instead, a good example of the "tactics" that I was referring to in my post.
Let me make one thing clear first: I really do feel horrible about your loss, and would *never* claim to understand the unspeakable toll it must continue to take. That's what matters most in all of this.
Still, I stand by what I wrote: I refuse to comment on your dispute with O'Hare and others because I don't know enough.
Most of the people you list for subpeona in the comments from Monday's post I have never met--many I have never even heard of before. When I started paying attention to LV blogs again last spring or so, it was obvious that I had walked into a massive battle that was--and is--murky to me. Though I had blogged back in 2005 and 2006, my new young family and time commitments had kept me away from what was (and is) a luxury for me--writing and commenting about Allentown issues. I don't know anything about your dispute with the Morning Call and its "Welcome Mat." I don't know anything about the trial(s). I've seen references to a Troll Parade (?), but have never seen it and don't know what it is--beyond some of your statements, which I trust, that some very very vile stuff has been posted there. It seems there are suits and counter-suits, and I have no idea about what the underlying issues are.
All I know is that when I waded back into the blog world it was clear that you are very pissed off, and that you believe that you've been wronged, not just by the justice system but by local bloggers.
Perhaps you could argue that it is my duty to dig back into all this and try to reconstruct for myself what has happend over the last couple of years. Maybe it is, and that's been my intention. Like many other things, I just haven't had time yet. I have two children under five, a very demanding job, and a number of center city Allentown commitments.
What I mean by "tactics" are the vicious name-calling, the "(for now)"-style implied threats, the insistence that public figures and blog readers shun others' blogs--that kind of thing. I know that you believe these aggressive steps (your "offense") are justified based on the wrongs that others have inflicted on you. Here's where I disagree, even without knowing enough about the wrongs themselves.
It's trite and cliched, but I firmly believe that the ends don't justify the means. In my view--and not to get too grand about it--this is _the_ main lesson of the 20th century. That's what I meant about "illiberal": trying to shut off others' voices in the name of a just cause is a contradiction in terms, to me. So I have been unsettled, since I started paying attention to local blogs, with the _means_ that you've been using to correct the injustices you see.
Somebody owes me $20 ... Part II
Let me put it this way. I find it plausible that O'Hare and others behaved callously toward you, or worse. I don't, however, _know_ that: I simply have not seen the proof (despite the sidebar content, which I have read). But let's just assume that it is true, for the sake of argument: it still wouldn't justify the comparisons to Hitler, the campaign to stop people from reading or commenting on his blog, the "allied evil sadists" claims, etc. On moral grounds, I think you're wrong to conduct yourself this way. I also think that you end up engaging in a form of friendly fire, where your tactics--fairly or not--draw attention away from your cause.
I am a natural ally. I care about center city Allentown like you do. I share your liberal politics. (I'm probably to your left; I'd like to see the US look more like Sweden.) I applaud the work that you and Angie have done with the arts in Allentown.
And yet--despite remaining neutral on grounds of ignorance--you jump to "douchebag", "loyal Team O'Hare Lap Dog," "another pussy whipped," etc.
My own alarm at your tactics went up a notch when you started attacking Michael Donovan, whom I admire and respect. I couldn't find any explanation for your vitriolic attacks on him, and I know, from personal experience, that the things that you've written about him are unfair at best.
Like I said, I don't know most of the people you list. I do know Mike Molovinsky a bit, and though I frequently disagree with him, I respect his smart and passionate blogging. I do know Bernie O'Hare a bit, from my early blogging days. Though I often disagree with him too--and dislike his press-release pass-along treatment of Dent and Cunningham, alongside auto-rejection of Pawlowski (and now Callahan)--my own experience is that he is a gifted writer, a pretty tireless investigator, who genuinely cares about issues like sunshine in government. Is he sometimes rude? Yes. Is he willing to admit when he's wrong? Not very often.
Has he treated you terribly? I genuinely don't know. I intend to do my own digging, and come up with my own judgment. Even if he has, your version of "offense" is both wrong and counterproductive, in my view. Why not blog about the substance of your dispute with the Call, with others, with O'Hare, without resorting to the name-calling, the us-vs.-them "allied evil sadists" talk, and all the rest?
Please post my note in full, or not at all. I'm not going to say anything more about it until I know more.
Respectfully, Jeff
My Take...
Here's my humble analysis of Pooley's remarks ...
Over & Out...
Well said.
Villas, put Jeff Pooley in the still duped by O'Hare department, sadly....
And not to pick his incoherent rantings of a mad man apart line by line or anything, but, this one really jumped out at me ...
"I do know Bernie O'Hare a bit, from my early blogging days."
Yeah. They co-authored a blog together That's more than knowing O'Hare "a bit," wouldn't you say?
Wanna know a bit more?
Here's another bit ...
Say "when ..."
WORTH REPEATING DEPARTMENT
(from previous post)
Just like how there's really no explaining why Fox News has more viewers than MSNBC, there's no explaining how or why anyone (e.g., Jeff Pooley) could still be duped by O'Hare. But there it is.
Somebody posted a comment here recently that, sadly, hits the nail on the head on this issue. The commenter said (and I'm paraphrasing) ... "many people are fans of sadistic evil. They actually prefer it, over good."
-----------
Thankfully, the "court of public (local blogosphere) opinion," which sadly appears to be duped in the majority and siding w/ a disbarred evil sadist (O'Hare) and against an aggrieved family ... won't be the Judge & Jury in our lawsuit.
Well said.
And as flawed and as crooked as our local (or any) justice system can be, it's encouraging to remember that our local courts recently got it right in Lehigh County ...
and they got it right in Northampton County.
;D
Okay, so Pooley doesn't want to speak w/ someone who calls him a pussy. Point taken.
But what's his excuse for not answering Bill's 3 excellent questions? Looks like he has plenty of ink...
I find it really laughable that Dr. Pooley who is so darn busy has taken the time to grasp totally the "Villa tactics" he so deplores, but along the way, has not managed to run across any of the tactics used by Team O'Hare on Sheena's family. How is this even mathematically possible let alone plausible?
And somebody owes me $5.
Regardless of the taunting, I promise to look at the facts and decide for myself what happened during the two or three years that I tuned out. All I know at the moment is what I've seen myself since last spring. But I think it's only fair that I look into the backstory, and I intend to.
"But I think it's only fair that I look into the backstory, and I intend to."
Maybe he'll start a blog about it, or perhaps he's too busy?
Jeff .. I'll believe that when you come crawling w/ an apology.
You should have been familiar w/ the "backstory" before posting "LVCI calls it quits" and taking such an un-informed (by your own admission) bold stand in support of Team O'Hare and against an aggrieved family > w/ comments disabled.
I'll refrain from "piling on" here and drawing any more embarrassing attention to your email ramblings and jaw-droppingly inane statements such as how you admire Mike Molovinsky's "smart and passionate" blogging. Jesus.
Good luck coming out of your coma and losing those cataracts.
And expect a subpoena.
"I promise to look at the facts and decide for myself what happened during the two or three years that I tuned out." -Jeff Pooley
Jeff, you "promised" to do exactly this in a blog comment here about a year ago.
If you're too busy, well, that's life, and we won't lose any sleep over it.
But in the future, please refrain from taking such a boldly confident (and comment-blocked) stand against us ... and in support of a team of Allied Evil Sadists ... when, by your admission, you don't know shit from shinola about what's been being perpetrated on us for several years now.
And if these things were being perpetrated on YOU, and YOUR family, your "tactics" might veer towards the "un-civil" too.
I found Pooley's written response well-reasoned, but flawed, inasmuch as he admits he does not know the entire story. It troubles me when anyone takes a position based on half-facts. Although it may be well-intentioned, that type of thinking is dangerously akin to adopting a mob mentality. I can appreciate some of his points, but again, those points are made without the back story, as he admits.
I really am anxious to see another post by Pooley, given that he promised to look into things a little deeper.
Until then, I agree that Pooley's remarks were written from ignorance.
P.S. Jeff, we're still seeking LVCI's real name and mailing address for his subpoena and (just a reminder) there's a CASH REWARD for providing it.
Pooley could apologize to Sheena's family at A-Town Afterthoughts now (why wait for the back story to "come to him") as his present tense transgression is rather obvious to all as noted by 3:59.
Interesting, I see Jeff Pooley can manage to carve some time out of his busy busy schedule to very closely monitor blog happenings when the topic is Jeff Pooley.
I just posted a brief update to the original post, linking to this post, the comments, and noting that I opened up (moderated) comments. (My normal practice, as I describe in the "about" section of my blog, is to disable comments for shorter posts.)
Yeah. I see.
No mea culpa mention of having originally posted from a position of (self-admitted) ignorance.
And no apology.
Also, who's idea was it to open it up to comments, now? Yours or O'Hare's?
Hey Jeff, just a heads-up, now that you're blogging full-time and blowing oxygen on the fire, keep this info handy ...
I've promised to look into it more. But I stand by my points in the post and my reply: no matter what the truth is--and I intend to find out--I don't think it's right to go on "offense" in the way that you do.
On opening up comments: actually, I was responding to your repeated mentions of the original disabling. I agreed with your point. To state the obvious: O'Hare did not ask me too .
Jeff I'm available for flip-cam interviews...
"I've promised to look into it more ... no matter what the truth is--" -Jeff Pooley
Right. Not to "color" your objective and unbiased investigation or anything, Jeff, but here's what the Disciplinary Board of the PA Supreme Court cited in booting O'Hare out of the lawyering profession:
"dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, unauthorized activity, forgery, cover-up, conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, illegal conduct, and moral turpitude."
"Moral Turpitude" = evil intent activity.
My point being, O'Hare's a highly skilled liar.
Only 2 people have ever "tagged him."
Me (and I'm just getting started).
And George Usry.
Sadly, no Cliff Notes.
But everything in our multi-part exposé on O'Hare can be corroborated via The Morning Call archives.
So, am I beating up on a poor defenseless guy (O'Hare) who "made some mistakes" many years ago but changed his ways and doesn't deserve my relentless COUNTER attacks.
No.
O'Hare never changed his ways.
He was disbarred for purposefully sabotaging (w/ evil intent) his own African American client's civil rights litigation against Bethlehem Steel (read all about it in our exposé).
And 23 years later, he's publicly threatening to do the exact same thing to my family-- i.e., purposefully sabotage the civil (wrongful death) litigation of my daughter Sheena.
Jeff. This isn't conjecture, or interpretation, or theory.
These are The Fuckin' Facts.
Lots more on our right sidebar ...
Dr. Pooley ...
if you put Bill's 6:08 comment
on one side of a scale ...
and Bill referring to people as douche bags or pussies on the other side of the scale ...
does it really "balance out" for you?
Granted, it did for NeoCon Knucklehead Dave Najarian.
But come on, you too?
Editor's Note:
as a gesture of goodwill (for now), I have removed the text from my post that previously described Jeff Pooley as a "loyal Team O'Hare Lap Dog."
Like LVCI is.
Recently, Jeff Pooley went BERSERK (but in a good way) over O'Hare calling Ernie Atiyah a "Pawlowski Toadie" in a post.
You JUST WAIT to see how ENRAGED Pooley gets after he reads THIS!
Frankly, I'm concerned we'll have to restrain him.
"I used to be such a sweet, sweet thing
Till they got a hold of me"
Well said.
Quick story ... Sheena, in the dance off-season, frequently worked at the LV Mall at several different stores (Abercrombie, Origins, Trade Secret). One day at Origins she had a father and daughter come in together and the dad said his daughter's name, "Calico" which Sheena thought was an unusual and cool name. So they both get some beauty products and the dad hands Sheena his credit card and the name on it said Alice Cooper, which, when Sheena looked from the card to his now in close-up face, was, gulp, indeed, a completely charming Alice Cooper. Yep. True story.
Alice Cooper played Musikfest in Bethlehem PA on AUG 7, 2004.
You are one sick Mother. What do you do,keep your daughter's dead body in the basement so you can whore it around like a trophy? You oughta call this the How I whore my dead daughter blog. I bet you masterbate on her everytime you mention the name of one of your enemies. You and your wife are two of the sickest fucks I have ever read. Get some help.
Jeff ...
does that last comment bother you as much as Ernie Atiyah being called a "Pawlowski Toadie."
It should, dont'cha think?
Not really retired ...
Domain Name > ptd.net
IP Address > 24.115.199.174 (PenTeleData)
City > Allentown
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 5:39:49 pm
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 11:01:33 am
A dumb-ass slip of the tongue at another blog resulted in this "guy" inadvertently confessing to having posted the above-referenced vile "basement/masturbating" comment here on Fri Jan 08, 02:59:00 PM.
Domain Name > (Unknown)
IP Address > 4.58.166.162 (Level 3
Operating System > Microsoft WinXP
Browser > Internet Explorer 7.0
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 12:19:44 pm
O'Hare's wondering if when Bill crushes him in court if Bill will really follow-through on his pledge to burn all of O'Hare's remaining possessions (which Bill will own) in a barrel in Nazareth. Bill tells me that he indeed WILL follow-through on this pledge .. but out of respect for Jeff Pooley he won't call O'Hare any names (e.g., douche bag, pussy, etc.) while the fire is raging.
Domain Name > aol.com
IP Address > 172.129.143.# (America Online)
Operating System > Microsoft WinXP
Browser > Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Alexa Toolbar)
Time of Visit > Feb 3 2010 10:26:35 pm
Message for Dr. Pooly if he's still doing research,it’s true that Bill Villa and Mrs. Dottie both occasionally hurl invectives like “douche bag” and “dunces” at the gang of cyber bullies (a/k/a/ Team O’hare) that’s been provoking them. But as you’re doing your research, be on the lookout for these “tactics” that you’ll see being used regularly on the Villas by Team O’hare … my point being, things more than balance out on this “tactics” score which you’ve been needlessly focused on, IMHO. Here's some "tactics" used by Team O'hare on Bill and Angie:
Advertising whore
Grant-seeking Stepford wife w/ an implant chip in her brain
"Delores"
Dangerously suicidal (Bill)
Sicko enabler (angie)
Nutz
Whack jobs
Transvestite sex change (angie)
Lousy father
Awful parents
Urine drinker
Feces eater
Incestuous necrophiliac masterbator (via Chris Casey)
That's an excellent point that (sadly) had to be made, thank you.
The salient point being ...
for anyone (e.g., Dr. Pooley) who's doing research, try to focus on the RELEVANT, i.e., the 3 counts in our civil lawsuit vs. O'Hare ...
1. Malicious Prosecution
2. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
3. Libel
We didn't craft these accusations out of thin air.
It's all "out there" in our local blogosphere, and much (not all) of it is condensed, for your convenience, at our blog's right sidebar.
Something also to keep in mind ...
Our Winning Track Record in court involves presenting SUBSTANTIVE prosecutions and defenses to judges and juries.
* We were instrumental in getting Sheena's killer nearly double the typical PA prison sentence for DUI Homicide (and nearly 100X the typical DA Jim Martin DUI/drinking buddy "wrist slap")
* We were awarded $3.1 Million in our lawsuit against Sheena's killer and O'Malley's Bar
* We prevailed vs Dave Najarian (yawn)
* We prevailed (breezily) vs O'Hare
If any of the judges or juries in any of our victorious criminal and civil cases thought we were "nutz" ... they did not express that opinion to us.
We were very pleased w/ their opinions and we expect to continue being pleased by the courts.
Here's O'Hare's track record ...
Bill, in all due respect, you are wasting what I am certain is valuable time of yours. Jeff Pooley is probably working on a 10,000-word 2nd doctoral thesis in defense and support of O'Hare. Who cares? As you've said it here yourself, the only opinions that actually matter here are yours, Angie's, the judge's, and the jury's. Just sayin'.
Happy Birthday to Alice Cooper, who turns 62 today.
Trivia: How old was he when he recorded his first hit, "18"?
Answer: 23.
BTW, 62 is the new 48.
Thanks anon 11:09, and all the others for your support.
Dear Jeff,
I would think it would be easy for a man with a PhD to see through the lies of O'Hare, but unfortunately many people around here embrace hate, and refuse to believe the truth. We have presented the facts at this blog. Jeff, if you can't see past Bill's sometimes harsh approach, or if you still believe that O'Hare is a good man, then Bill and I need to move on and continue to do what's right.
O'Hare is an evil sadist, and I don't believe my words are too strong or offensive in describing him that way. In addition to his public smears of me, he has sent me taunting and vile e-mails telling me I "have my head up my ass", and enable a sick man. He is sub-human, and mean spirited. But Jeff you are right, O'Hare is "gifted", a gifted liar and he has fooled many people.
Also, Bill and I have volunteered our time to help improve Allentown and have written many positive posts at this blog about 7th St, and downtown. We give our art and our music to the community. And we are not doing it for the recognition, we do it because we believe it is the right thing to do. What would be our motivation to lie about anything? We have taken action to improve Allentown, while others criticize from behind their computers. I am an educator, and I spend many hours volunteering at my son's school in Allentown.
O'Hare and his followers, Molovinsky, team Casey, have been critical, and flat out just make stuff up, about people who volunteer. That's disgraceful. I believe O'Hare is a danger to our community and should be exposed and ostracized as the liar and sadist he truly is.
But there will always be those fans of evil sadism, and we will continue to call them out, it's our civic duty. If you find our approach offensive, then our blog is not for you. This is OUR blogging style, maybe you don't believe it's the right approach, but we do. We can't let O'Hare poison the minds of young people trying to make a difference in our community.
Isn't that a cool coincidence, Alice Cooper's birthday! Timing's everything.
Mrs. D, re: "not letting" O'Hare poison the minds of the young ones, although that's a most noble thought, I dunno ... look how freakin' duped by O'Hare young "guys" like Geoff Brace and Mike Schlossberg and the Kleiner and Iron Pigpen Oeler Twins are. I say fuck 'em and let 'em go over the cliff (not a threat) w/ Der Fuhrer O'Hare at the risk of my tactics showing.
But I agree w/ everything else you said, honeykins.
Your tactics are showing! Ha!
I say keep up the good work Bill, I know you are a good man. This blog rules.
"Nose for News" (wink wink) Watchdogs
Domain Name > (Unknown)
IP Address > 163.192.12.# (Tribune Company)
ISP > The Morning Call
Time of Visit > Feb 4 2010 1:17:00 pm
Domain Name > (Unknown)
IP Address > 64.9.15.# (LVAIC - Cedar Crest College)
City > Allentown
Time of Visit > Feb 4 2010 5:15:24 pm
"LVCI" (how's that retirement going?), listen, we still need your real name and address to send you a subpoena, and there's a CASH REWARD for providing it, so how about sending it to us yourself before Molovinsky does? Give it some "thought" ...
Domain Name > ptd.net
IP Address > 24.115.199.174 (PenTeleData)
City > Allentown
Time of Visit > Feb 4 2010 9:04:31 am
Time of Visit > Feb 2 2010 8:27:49 am
Domain Name > aol.com
IP Address > 172.129.186.# (America Online)
Operating System > Microsoft WinXP
Browser > Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Alexa Toolbar)
Time of Visit > Feb 4 2010 11:03:09 am
Visit Length > 1 hour 18 minutes 11 seconds
Post a Comment